139 · Tier 3 — High-impact political/media nodes

Jonathan V. Last

Editor

AI position

Aware of x-risk

In "We Can Choose Not to Let AI Destroy Us" (Feb 2026) he engages with AI-destroys-us framing but pivots the argument toward economic/social collapse from rapid disruption rather than treating classic extinction-risk arguments as the throughline; a Bulwark Podcast segment titled "Can We Trust AI Tycoons?" (Apr 2026) also touches the theme, though transcript detail wasn't accessible.

Why influential

Controls commissioning, placement, talent, headlines or institutional resources, making this person a gatekeeper for what receives sustained attention. Primary policy lanes: elections; republican politics; democracy; media.

Who pays attention

Institutional Republicans, anti-Trump conservatives, Democratic strategists, donors and democracy-focused professionals

Work samples

AI-world contacts

  • Ellie Pavlick Computer scientist / AI researcher, Brown University

    • Wrote aboutdirectness unclassifiedQuoted by Last on the epistemic uncertainty of AI's trajectory in his Feb 2026 piece on AI risk.
  • Emily Bender Linguist, co-author of 'The AI Con', University of Washington

    • Wrote aboutdirectness unclassifiedCited by Last as a critical voice characterizing LLM hype/limitations.
  • Alex Hanna Director of Research; co-host of Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000, DAIR (Distributed AI Research Institute)

    • Wrote aboutdirectness unclassifiedCited alongside Bender as an AI-hype critic in Last's piece.